77|Page in accordance with university policy. No course grade where a penalty for academic honesty has been assessed can be appealed under the university’s Grade Appeal Policy. 1. The student may be given a grade-reduction penalty within the course in which the act occurred and/or be required to fulfill additional academic requirements within the course at the discretion of the instructor. The grade reduction may encompass one portion of a course (such as a particular assignment or exam) or apply to the entire course (such as dropping the student one letter grade). 2. The student may be given a failing grade of “F” for the course. Instructors have the right to assign such a grade for any instance of academic dishonesty, and the student may not withdraw from the course in order to avoid this penalty. 3. The student may be temporarily suspended from enrollment at the university. 4. The student may be permanently dismissed from enrollment at the university. Procedures No sanction for academic dishonesty may be imposed upon a student without following the procedures established in this policy. Students accused of academic dishonesty in the context of a course in progress who intend to request a formal hearing in order to contest the allegations may continue to attend the class in question until the case is resolved. If the course in question ends before the case is resolved, the instructor shall submit a grade of “NG” (no grade), that will be replaced with the appropriate grade upon resolution of the case. The term “class days” as used in this policy refers to days when classes are officially scheduled at the university during the Fall and Spring semesters and during the Summer and Winter sessions. Thus, final exam days, holidays, recesses, and breaks are excluded. The term “week” refers to any period of time spanning five class days. Formal hearings are only held during the Fall and Spring semesters. If a case is not resolved by the end of the course in which the alleged violation occurred, then the matter is continued to the following Fall or Spring semester. If a violation is discovered after the instructor of the course is no longer employed by the university or if the time deadlines for a case extend beyond the period of employment of the instructor, then the chair of the department in question or the chair’s designee may substitute for the instructor in the procedures associated with this policy. The Informal Resolution Process The informal resolution process applies to situations when the instructor believes that an alleged act of academic dishonesty can be resolved within the course by enforcing either the first or second sanction, that is, where the maximum penalty sought by the instructor is no greater than failure in the course with a grade of “F.” Instructors are urged to confer with or at least inform the chair of the department in question about any charges of academic dishonesty. 1. Arranging the initial meeting between the instructor and the student. Within two (2) weeks of when the instructor first becomes aware of an instance of academic dishonesty in the course, the instructor shall inform the student that the student must meet with the instructor to discuss the incident. 2. The initial meeting and filling out the Academic Dishonesty Report Form – Undergraduate Students.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzcxOTE=